Carbo-phobe or a denialista?

One thought on “Carbo-phobe or a denialista?”

  1. Ian Dunlop acquitted himself very well, though he could have been stronger and more specific on the scientific detail: my impression was that he presented the level of scientific confidence on some basic questions to be much more equivocal than it is. He let Evans get away with a string of utterly false claims.

    What a hopelessly weak performance from Ray Evans! No scientific case of any substance at all. A large soup of irrelevancies, mixed with a cup of straw men, and spiced up with a handful of downright false statements. Just goes to show how bereft of scientific argument the Greenhouse Mafia (of which Evans is a key member) really is.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s