Eat your dog (or cat), save the planet

11 thoughts on “Eat your dog (or cat), save the planet”

  1. David – the numbers do seem a little skewed (see here for some discussion from dog owners over at Slashdot). I guess what interests me here is the footprint of things in daily life that we take for granted (ever wonder why we still get a copy of the Yellow Pages each year?). The Real Climate discussion of Superfreakonomics is pretty incredible, but for some reason your link doesn’t work – try this instead: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-steve-levitt/)

    Like

  2. Odd, the link looks exactly the same, perhaps it’s the opening bracket?

    I don’t disagree with the idea of examining daily footprints. I just think on the list of things we might consider need to be done about greenhouse gases, this would be somewhere between 100 and 200 at best. I also think we run the strong risk of telling people that nothing they do in daily life can continue. And this is the kind of misconception that denialists prey on (back to the stone age etc). Telling people to kill and eat their pets because they are a major contributor to global warming is going to at best invite (quite rightly) derision and at worst have people say “oh stuff it, I’m not going to do anything if that’s what they are going to try to make me do”.

    Like

  3. Hi Boxer, We just picked up a 2 month puppy from the RSPCA this weekend. Unfortunately, he doesn’t look very palatable… maybe when he grows a little larger?

    Like

  4. i feel guilty about owning cats. but then, i feel guilty about many things i do wrt how i live on this planet. i DO have cats desexed, however… and i myself did not produce any children, who, as someone earlier pointed out, might be worse emitters and footprint-makers than the average moggy…

    Like

  5. This is an incredibly irresponsible post. Please consider that you have no science or ultimate footprint knowledge to back this up. You are an ignorant source.

    Like

  6. This is very ignorant. Why would you post a singular ecological study that as you disprove yourself is stupid!! Pets are something that should be considered in the emotional capacity that they are and become. Studies have shown, conclusively, that pets reduce stress and/or potentially hurt-full actions.

    Pet dogs, throughout evolution have aided the entire growth of society. A true scientist, looks at the facts and revists them. You topic title alone proves ignorance. Some of us are trying to help, please join that side.

    Like

  7. This is disgusting; it is insane to eat your dog/cat or any other household pet. tHat is like eating your best friend in some cases >:I

    Like

  8. supidest thing i have ever heard, yes they may have a bif ecological foot print but wouldnt it makes more sense to use mor fuel efficient cars, get a carbon tax etc. then make innocent animals suffer. It is not a cat or dogs fault that global warming, climate change, whatever you want to call it. It is purely human beings fault this is happening.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s