Resisting the Green Dragon

9 thoughts on “Resisting the Green Dragon”

  1. I’ve often run up against the first point, regarding ecosystem resilience and about protecting the poor.

    As if increasing desertification events and extinction rates don’t speak for themselves, an excellent paper by Fischer, Lindenmayer and Manning (2006) makes it quite clear that ecosystem resilience rely on keystone species protection and avoiding islandisation among other things. There’s simply no evidence that God gave us a world to exploit without detrimental consequences, but ample evidence to the contrary.

    As for developing nations, just looking at 2 recent papers; Giam et al(2010)[doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.019], and Vörösmarty et al (2010) [doi:10.1038/nature09440], I’d suggest that they are most at risk, not only to climate change, but also adopting unsustainable practices from developed nations over the coming century. Protecting the poor means helping them avoid our previous mistakes. Much of the discussions and suggestions made by different groups who identify climate change as a major concern over the coming century also acknowledge that one of the top priorities is a sharing of wealth from developed nations to developing nations to help assist adaptation.

    Hypocritically, this Cornwall Alliance is urging business as usual which comes with continuing the ignorance of struggling nations.


  2. This is all kinds of nuts. Another example of people using religion as an excuse to push a stupid agenda. I find some solace in the fact that there are non-crazy religious folk out there who clearly recognise the ecological limits of the planet, and the impact that climate change is having on the poor.


  3. Christianity is not a dangerous religion, environmentalism is. The idea that you want to spend billions of dollars on a problem that may or may not exist hundreds or thousands of years in the future – when we have people dying of poverty now….you would just be pushing more and more people into poverty with $10.00 gas prices and 40% increases in electric costs, and huge transporation cost increases for all the goods we buy, which would come back to us…Environmentalists have a VERY BAD track record when it comes to dire predictions. Why should we believe them now? In the 70’s, it was global cooling that was supposed to destroy us. Weathermen can’t predict two days from now accurately and we want to try to trust them with predictions for hundreds of years?


  4. As a Scandinavian Im very puzzeled by this battle between religion/environmentalism/politics. Why not keep things seperate for a clearer vision?
    Is there anywhere I can watch or buy this “Resisting the Green Dragon”? I would like to explore the topic more. Thanks – Stay Green 🙂


  5. Resisting the Green Dragon (RTGD) claims to be an exposé on the modern environmentalist movement, casting its supporters as touting a hidden agenda to promote “pagan” ideals and, ultimately, to gain global political dominion. Contributors to this series assert that environmentalists hold unbiblical views of humanity’s place in creation amongst other creatures and that God’s exclusive concern is for human souls. But upon closer inspection, many of their claims prove scripturally and theologically problematic, and in an age when our planet’s biological health truly hangs in the balance (think BP oil spill or Japan’s nuclear accident), such irresponsible perspectives are dangerous and need to be challenged.

    To see my full response to this film visit:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s